Abstract:
Identity Border Crossings in films about Africa: An analysis of Hotel Rwanda, Shooting
Dogs and Sometimes in April concerns itself with the analysis of ethnonationalist
constructions in film. The main purpose of this study is to underscore that identity is a
contested construct told by many narratives. However, some characters constantly experience
border crossings to manage their competing identities which highlight the porousness of
identity borders. The significance of this studyis that it is interdisciplinary and contributes
literature to the fields of film, Literature, Ethnic studies, Political science, among other
disciplines. In addition, whilemost studies on films about Rwandan genocide have
highlighted the role of film directors in misrepresenting the actual genocide hence
exacerbating the ethnic divide between the Hutu and Tutsi, this studyhas focused on the
construction of ethnonationalist identities in Rwanda to underscore that identity is a social
construct used to achieve various ends. This study has four objectives: to interrogate the
construction of ethnic identity and national difference in Hotel Rwanda, Shooting Dogs and
Sometimes in April, to investigate the implications of ethnic superiority and dominance of
characters in the films, to examine the struggles of ethnic minorities in marginal spaces in the
films and to evaluate the emergence of new identities and their role in shaping the identity
politics playing out in the films. The study uses Theory of Nationalism: primordialism,
instrumentalism and constructivism by Ernest Gellner (1964) and Structuralist Film Theory
by Leo Kuleshov (1979) to unveil underlying meanings in thefilms. Being qualitative in
nature, the study uses exploratory research design.It adopts purposive sampling to select three
out of nine historical filmsbased on their thematic density. Secondary data has been sourced
from books, journals, theses, dissertations, literary and filmic materials. Data collection was
done through observation, an informal table and note-taking. Data analysis and presentation
was guided by the theory of nationalism, structuralist film theory and the historical
construction of identities in Rwanda because the films take a historical trajectory. The study
arrived at the following findings: Using primordialism, the study found out that the Hutu
construct their nation using history, land, physical traits, coded language, media, and the
national identity card. Through instrumentalism, the study found out that some characters put
their own interests ahead of group interests andcriss cross their identity borders for economic
and political benefits. The study found out that the quest for an exclusive Hutu nation leads to
ethnic hegemony and national strife which calls for the use of enmification, execution lists
and mobilisation of militia groups to ‘other’ the Tutsi, ultimately leading to the genocide.
Using constructivism, the study concludes that identity is a fluid construct that keeps
refashioning in different contexts. Hutu characters cross their ethnic borders and protect the
Tutsi in marginal spaces during the genocide.Whites equally transcend their racial boundaries
to help the Rwandese after the UN evacuates white nationals. Finally, the study concludes
that post-genocide identities transcend difference and concentrate on reconstructing Rwanda,
which highlights the plasticity of identity borders. The study recommends that more studies
be carried out on identity politics in film to underscore the reality that identity is a social
construct used to serve political, social and economic ends. These studies could be used to
avert violence by sensitizing citizens against group psychology. The study proposes areas for
further research as follows: A comparative study be carried out on identity politics on films
about Africa and the west to determine their similarities in order to highlight the universality
of identity construction. Another study could be conducted on the role of film techniques in
representing identity politics to the audiencein order to mediate ethnic tensions. Lastly, the
study proposes that a study be done on the same topic using a different genre and different
theories. This could be significant in relating the two genres and their modes of presentation